Case Study · AI Visibility
Andrew Guglielmi · June 2026

Case Study · From the field

Invisible to AI on June 5. A client lead from AI on June 23.

Andrew Guglielmi had no website, no Google Business Profile, and the AI tools called him a San Francisco commercial broker. He's a San Mateo property manager and licensed REALTOR®. Eighteen days later a stranger left him a voicemail — and said, unprompted, that he found Andrew through an AI query.

17 49
AI Visibility Score, same rubric (+32)
18
Days from assessment to first lead
1st
Inbound lead, sourced by AI query
100/100
On-page AEO score, new site

The result — June 23, 4:18 PM · Day 18

A lead that told us exactly how it found him

Eighteen days after Andrew had no website and no Google Business Profile, a San Mateo homeowner he'd never met called about a condo he's deciding whether to rent or sell — dead center in the "winnable lane" we'd built his presence around. Andrew asked how he found him:

"I honestly thought it was a prank call. I asked him right off the bat how he found me — he said, straight up: through an AI query and internet due diligence."

Andrew Guglielmi · REALTOR® & Property Manager, SC Properties · San Mateo, CA

That's strategy, not luck. We don't fight for "best property manager in San Mateo" — that's a knife fight every agent is already in. We find the winnable lane: the specific, nuanced question a real owner actually asks AI — "should I rent or sell my San Mateo condo?" — and make Andrew the obvious answer. The more specific the query, the better his odds of being the name AI names.

See the site that did it: guglielmigroup.com →

The starting point — June 5

A near-zero presence — and what AI did see was wrong

On a Friday ground delay at SFO, we ran Andrew's first AI-visibility assessment. It came back 17/100. The problem was never Andrew — an experienced San Mateo property manager and REALTOR® whose past clients had left him a wall of five-star reviews. The problem was that AI, and the web it reads, couldn't see any of it.

!

Mistaken identity

AI tools described him as a San Francisco commercial broker. He's a San Mateo residential property manager and licensed REALTOR®.

!

Never recommended — 0 of 6

On "best property manager in San Mateo," he appeared zero times across Perplexity, ChatGPT, and Google's AI answers.

!

No home base

No website and no Google Business Profile of his own — so even his 5-star reviews lived only on third-party listings, with nothing of his own for AI to read and attribute to him.

17 49/100
▲ 32 points · 15 days

The foundation got built; the off-page work (entity, citations) is still in flight — which is why it keeps climbing.

AI Visibility is 30% footprint + 70% website — building the site moved the number.

17 → 49, by dimension

Same six-dimension rubric, measured June 5 vs. June 20.

needs attentionroom to growstrong

AI Recommendations12 → 15
Reviews (the moat)45 → 80
Website / Schema0 → 94
Entity & Consistency25 → 25
Citations12 → 12
Google Business Profile0 → 58

What we did — 18 days

Build the foundation, then make it findable.

Fri · June 5
The tarmac assessment

First AI-visibility scan via LeadJens Dispatch. Baseline 17/100. We mapped the exact questions a Peninsula owner asks AI — and every place Andrew was missing.

Week of June 9
Clean the record, build the base

Corrected name, address, and phone across 10+ profiles, killed the stale "San Francisco / Colliers" framing, and claimed and built his Google Business Profile. Andrew asked past clients for reviews — they were glad to leave them — taking him to 27 five-star reviews.

June 17–18
A website engineered for AI

Launched guglielmigroup.com — 100/100 on-page AEO, schema validated zero errors, the niche language AI rewards, his 27 five-star reviews brought over as machine-readable data, and a concierge chatbot routing every inquiry to Andrew.

June 18 & 22
Proof, published

Two in-depth client stories — a Redwood City trust-estate sale and a San Mateo industrial lease-up — published and shared, each answering the questions real owners ask.

June 20
Re-assessment: 49/100

A 32-point jump in 15 days, same rubric. Website (0→94), reviews (45→80), and GBP (0→58) did the lifting.

Tue · June 23
Fed the engines — and the phone rang

Verified Google Search Console + Bing Webmaster Tools and submitted the sitemap. At 4:18 PM the same day, Andrew got a voicemail from a homeowner he'd never met.

Done-with-you, not done-for-you

Look at who did what. Andrew built his own Google Business Profile and asked his own past clients for the reviews — 27 of them. We didn't do those for him; we handed him the blueprint and held him accountable to it. What LeadJens built is the system that made all of it visible: the website, the schema, the entity, the engines that feed AI. He brings the relationships and the hustle; we build the machine — and the plan — that gets him found. That's the model, and it's why the win is his to keep, and to repeat.

The honest part

We never promised Andrew leads. The plan put the first AI-sourced inquiry at Day 90–180, and we said plainly that closings come from how Andrew handles the call — not from us. One lead in 18 days is a single data point, not a guarantee, and we'll say that to anyone.

But it's the exact outcome the system is built to produce: a stranger, searching with AI, finding the right agent with the right story attached — and reaching out. The funnel filled faster than the model predicted. That's the case worth making.

When your next client asks AI about you, do you show up?

See exactly what ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI say about you today — free.

Get Your Free AI Visibility Score

Reflects one client's engagement over 18 days in June 2026 and a single inbound lead; individual results vary and are not guaranteed. AI Visibility Score is LeadJens's proprietary rubric, measured point-in-time from publicly available sources that change frequently. Client named and quoted with permission. © 2026 LeadJens.